Sunday, July 5, 2009

More Blabbering Disclosure Later; For now...

Folks, I'll get back to this riveting story of self-discovery later. For now, I'd like to share a few thoughts on our first reading, Moore's 1950 article on Labs and Clinics. What you'll notice early and often is his reference to the laboratory/clinic purpose of "removing deficiencies." He's writing mid-century, hightime for positivist thinking within education, marked by the adoption of scientific (or pseudo-scientific) language and method across the disciplines. The language, even in humanities, bows toward scientific method. Identifying a facility as a Writing Clinic or Writing Laboratory would seem to add an element of certainty to the work that's accomplished therein. As Moore's article demonstrates, we've been applying medical terminology and metaphor to our discussions of literacy for quite some time. In "Reconceptualizing the language of adult literacy," Isley and Stahl (1993) examine some of the more persistent metaphors and models for literacy and literacy education. One of the more odious examples is the medical metaphor, which understands illiteracy as a societal disease or an affliction. Sufferers are encouraged to check into learning clinics where their "symptoms are hypothesized during a triage-like intake interview" (p. 7). A follow-up diagnosis is made, and an individualized treatment plan is prescribed. This is the Writing Clinic that Moore is observing. The allure of the medical metaphor is the perception that literacy education--that writing instruction--can be scientifically precise. This model, however, is not very appealing to potential participants, and it situates the problem squarely within the individual--not the system or society. In other words, students needing treatment have writing deficiencies that are indicative of personal, mental, or learning deficiencies. The legacy of the historical manifestation of the Writing Center as clinic still works against our mission; the legacy is that the Writing Center is seen as a site of remediation and is the province of defective students.

1 comment:

  1. As I was reading Moore's article, I found myself jettisoned into the illuminated screens of Dead Poets' Society and Mona Lisa Smile, and like Mr. Keating and Miss Watson, I too wanted to fight against the current-traditional methods of the 1950s, which included the need for a student to bring in a writing "specimen" for proper "consultation" at the writing clinic or labratory. Moore's article is quite comical, to me, in light of the changes that have occured not only in writing centers, but also in composition theory and educational pedagogy, in general. In an writing center world where global is emphasized over local, it is interesting to note that in Moore's article he provides suggestions of pamphlets for correcting spelling (which continues to taint my English reputation) before suggestions for organization and development. Furthermore, the later can be quickly solved with a little "demonstration" and "practice," according to Moore.

    I feel as though writing centers are still battling the stigma that began in centers like Moore describes. Some students feel as though receiving help from the writing center automatically deems them lesser, insufficient, and plain ol' stupid. While I was working Customs one week, a young gentleman accompanied a young woman to each of the booths. As they came to the UWC booth, I handed each of them a flier and began my speil, addressing each equally. Once I was finished and encouraged them to come by and see us (because it was FREE [and as I always say, if it's fo' free, then it's fo' me]), the gentlman informed me that he was an English major, and a senior to boot, and that he did not need the services of the UWC. I smiled my syrupy-sweet, saleswoman smile and mentioned that everyone can benefit from an extra pair of eyes looking at a paper. He dismissed me, of course, albeit politely, and I could just hear the inner monologue: "Yeah right, lady."

    Carino tries to temper such reactions as mine by providing a broader survey of writing center history, yet my incredulous reaction to Moore's article overshadows Carino's attempt at dilpomacy.

    ReplyDelete